The way in which we understand and relate to negative space as a society is quite archaic –– limiting even. In order for us to truly cognize such a conception on a much larger scale, we must remove the bounds that often surround it. Once allowing it to be free of all restriction, we will finally be able to see and study the multidimensionality of something whose complexity is often disregarded I find much of the restrictive nature present within negative space stems from the way we commonly define it. Historically, people view it within the realm of art, attributing a definition of the space around and between the subject(s) of an image. In this regard, such a classification does the idea of negative space some justice, but the implications are way too reductive.